All birds can fly. Penguins are birds. Which conclusion is logically drawn from these two statements alone, even though it conflicts with real-world fact?

Question

Accepted Answer

Penguins can fly. In syllogism questions, conclusions are drawn strictly from the given statements, not from outside real-world knowledge .  All birds fly + Penguins are birds => Penguins can fly (logically, within this closed system)

All birds can fly. Penguins are birds. Which conclusion is logically drawn from these two statements alone, even though it conflicts with real-world fact?

Explanation